Arnold’s Epochs of Expansion Essay

I am bound by my own rendering of connoisseurism a open-hearted endeavor to learn and propagate the best that is known and persuasion in the world (Leitch 824) said the Victorian poet and tyro Matthew Arnold. Matthew Arnold, an English poet and amateur whose resolve was both a representative of the quixotic ideas and of the Victorian talented concerns ulterior on was the primary literary amateur of his age. Arnolds tyroal theories is highlighted mainly through his most substantial tyroal prose The manipulation of reprimand at the Present Time in which he examines the employment of the tyro in society and presents his critical invention. Arnolds contri notwithstandingion to literary scheme is his theories on ages of involution and periods of concentration, which throughout the course of this essay will be thoroughly explained. Matthew Arnold, a Romantic poet alter into a critic of the Romantic Age, contributes to the English critical theories, the concept o f terms of blowup and epochs of concentration.Matthew Arnold, poet and critic was born on December 24 1822 in Laleham, Middlesex England and passed absent April 15, 1888. He was considered the father of the refreshing-fashi one and single(a)d reflection movement into the Objective Theory. Arnold was the eldest son of Thomas Arnold, historiographer and famous headmaster of rugby football, and of Mary (Penrose) Arnold. Throughout the beginning of Arnolds sprightliness he was educated at Rugby and then at Balliol College, University of Oxford, where he graduated. Shortly by and by Arnold graduated he was elected to a caller at Oriel, and after t individuallying a little at Rugby he became a private secretary to the Marquis of Lans rafte. After seemly the private secretary to Lord Lans megabuckse, he was appointed to inspector of schools, a position he held up until 1886, two years before his death.During his status he went on a derive of missions and visitation of European schools. He was impressed by some of the educational systems that he wrote several deforming about them as wholesome. Arnolds literary c atomic number 18er can be divided into four separate periods in which the first period was in the 1850s where a large amount of his poems appeargond the second organism in the 1860s in which his literary criticism and social criticism emerged and the third creation in the 1870s where his religious and educational writings surfaced finally the fourth period being the one in the 1880s, where his second set of essays in literary criticism emerged. The fact that Arnold was born into an age thatwas shifting from the Romantics into the Victorian Age gave him a perspective of both ages in which he actually wrote in both ages.Arnold began as a Romantic poet merely writing Romantic rime and displaying the various Romantic intellectual ideas. Later on, Arnold switched into prose and began writing critical whole kit in which Arnold became a critic of the Romantic Age and intellectual thoughts. Matthew Arnold was one of the most significant literary critics of his age. He was the Professor of Poetry at Oxford from the time of 1857 to 1867, during which he wrote his first books of criticism, including On Translating Homer (1861), Essays in blame (1865 Series 2, 1888), In the Study of Celtic Literature (1867), and a number of other books regarding criticism as well.In his first volume of Essays in unfavorable judgment, came Arnolds most important critical work in the stool of The social occasion of Criticism at the Present Time, in which Arnold examines the role of the critic in society and formulates the critical surmise of an epoch of expansion and epoch of concentration. Arnolds essay suggests that the critics role is one of a personal and social personality but the critic essential champion disinterestedness, according to Arnold, to produce a proper critique. Arnold wanted to lay down the rules for aesthetic nontextual matter in his age he wanted them to extradite rules in array to produce a salient anesthetic object. Arnold also tried to establish an aesthetic realm and emphasize the role of critics. Therefore, Arnold wrote The Function of Criticism at the Present Time, which is an essay where he laid down his theory and where he argued for the central role of the critic in assembling and producing great books.In Arnolds essay The Function of Criticism at the Present Time, Arnold asserted that criticism is a positive and stately task. Since, Arnold began as a poet and was a poet himself he gives some emphasis to the yeasty abilities of the poet yet he also gives a greater emphasis to the analytic abilities of the critic. Matthew Arnold introduced the concept of poetry as a synthesizing process in which the poet synthesizes ideas and puts these ideas together to form a work of art. He also introduced the role of the critic being the analyst of those ideas. So, in other words, Arnold sta tes that the poet collects the information and the critic saturates or dividesthose ideas and by dividing and synthesizing these ideas there will be an artistic process or dialogue in which the poets will see their work analyzed and look their weak points and try to synthesize new and respectable ideas.After the poet synthesizes newer and powerful ideas the critic then will take these ideas and analyze them, divide them, discipline them apart and talk about the strong and weak points in them, so this is a continual process of analyzing and synthesizing. Arnold gives the poet the productive ability and the critic the uninflected ability yet, both of them are creators, one of them synthesizes and produces or creates and the other analyzes and by analyzing he introduces new ideas to the poet. The critic introduces new ideas to the poet by analysis and stripping and by seeing the objects as they are and not as they are supposed to be. Therefore, the critic and poet are both mutua lly beneficial on each other and need the other to function well. Further more than, Arnold formulated a theory in which the world of art passes through periods which are called epochs. There are two epochs epoch of expansion and the other epoch is an epoch of concentration.Matthew Arnold delineate the epoch of expansion as a period in time in which the poets keep up up with new ideas, ideas that are very rare. Arnold believes that only the artistic world would pass through those two epochs. According to Arnold, the epoch of expansion was seen in two very important periods, the first epoch of expansion is Periclean Athens, in which the great voices and works of Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides existed, and the second epoch of expansion is Elizabethan England, where the greatest voices and works of William Shakespeare, Christopher Marlowe, and Ben Jonson flourished. Arnold states that the significance of those periods in the history of art is because they formed many new ideas that were rare at the time. Therefore, according to Arnolds definition, an epoch of expansion involved the poet synthesizing and creating a creative work of literature from the intellectual cultural moments at the time into a great work of literature.Arnold also defines the epoch of concentration as the epochs in which the critics find the broad(a) use of the ideas introduced in the epoch of expansion and they analyze it, and by analyzing them, they come up with new ideas topresent to the poets. In other words, the epoch of expansion consists of numerous new ideas that are emerge up and many sources in these periods that when they pass, the critics look at them, break them down, analyze them and then produce new ideas. The critics role would be of a rational nature in which he analyzes the object or work of literature. Then after the epoch of concentration presents the new ideas to the poets, another epoch of expansion comes to carriage by the poets in which they synthesized and p ut together newer ideas from the analysis of the critics in order to present a newer epoch of expansion.Time then passes as well and the critic takes those new ideas, breaks them down again, and analyzes them to come up with fresher ideas. Furthermore, the critics and poets are working one after the other, and each epoch completes the next by displaying its features. Yet, in the epoch of concentration, the criticism produced must maintain its independence of the interoperable spirit and its aim. (Leitch 822) This quote in simpler words states that the critic should be an sincere individual that does not let his emotions, thoughts, or any action in the country at the time to influence his analysis and that the analysis presented is found solely on the work of art presented to him. Therefore, the critics role in all branches of knowledge, theology, philosophy, history, art, science is to see the object as in itself it really is. (Leitch 806) The critics work later on influences the creative powers of the poets creativity and therefore precipitates the creative epochs of literature. (Leitch 808) Arnold states that the great force of the epoch of concentration was England and the greatest voice of this epoch was Burke.The objective idealogues made it their job to drift away from the Romantic values and establish their own similar to the Expressive theorists and their rebellions against the Neoclassicists. Therefore, they gave the critic a stronger role in producing great literature, which was not given by previous and older theorists and theories. Hence, Arnold aid that a critic is as important as the poet in this artistic process, which is very similar to Alexander popes ideas. Arnold also stated that the critic ought to have a disinterested way of looking at the world, being natural and not subjective, but objective.Therefore, some of Matthew Arnolds influences on his theories were of Aristotle, in the emphasis of the synthesizing process ofthe poet as a cr eative creator. An influence of Burke in referencing that the poet is a creative force and the critic is a rational force similar to the concept of Imagination and Judgment. There is also the influence of Alexander Pope in relating that the role of criticism is a positive and noble task and that the critic is as important if not more important than the poet himself. Finally, one more influence would be that of the Pragmatic way of asserting that criticism should be a neutral task and not biased.There is no interrogative sentence that Arnold influenced numerous individuals with his critical concept that one of those influenced by Arnold is T.S. Elliot, in the sort of replacig the Romantic emphasis on spontaneity, originality, and novelty with the new focus on history, culture and tradition. Elliot also presents his critical work The Function of Criticism being derived from the same title Arnold used in his critical work The Function of Criticism at the Present Time. Arnolds critici sm also had a major impact on the work of writers such as Walter Pater, Oscar Wilde, George Eliot, enthalpy James, Thomas Hardy, and even George Santayana, and Wallace Stevens. Another critic influenced by Matthew Arnold is Harold Bloom, a critic who expresses a lofty disregard for Arnold.Matthew Arnold, therefore, defines criticism as involving flexibility, openness, to new experiences, and rarityHe insists, too, on the free play of mind. (Leitch 805) Within Arnolds definition lies the concept of an epoch of expansion and an epoch of concentration being interdependent and related to each other. This view contributed to laying down the roles of each the poet and the critic as being the creative and rational individuals who synthesize and analyze great works of literature. Criticism might praise certain elements of literature, but must maintain dissatisfaction with the whole as long as it falls dead of the fullness of spiritual perfection. (Leitch 822) The critic is therefore the p ropagator of art, culture, and society. Through the critics work, fresh and true ideas are observed and passed into the world in order to shape and influence the creative mind. Without criticism, the flow of creativity and move on would be detained, according to Arnolds thoughts.In conclusion, Matthew Arnold, a Romantic poet transformed into a critic of the Romantic Age contributed highly to the Objective theorist approach to criticism. This contribution is presented through his great prose work The Function of Criticism at the Present Time, in which, the critical concept of an epoch of expansion and an epoch of concentration is presented. An epoch of expansion being an era, in which a poet creatively synthesizes an intellectual cultural moment into a great work of literature and the critic therefore in his epoch of concentration, analyzes this work disinterestedly and presents the weakness and strong points of this, therefore presenting fresher and newer ideas to the poet to be ta ken in consideration.The poet therefore, takes those ideas and applies them to the later works, which presents the interdependent relationship of both the critic and poet. This concept later on influenced a number of writers and critics and their works and contributed highly to the modern critical theory. I believe that throughout this research paper, I benefited a roofy from the information researched and presented and understand Arnolds perspective and theory to an extent that I can agree to his theory of the critic and poet being codependent on each others.