The Cons of Marijuana Usage

The juristicization of hemp is one of the close highly debated to the highest degree subjects facing Ameri stubs today. Advocates of legalization go for two major financial statements in their causal agency to need marihuana legalized. First, which is by far the biggest argument is that ganja has a significant aesculapian single-valued function. The second argument is that ganja does non receive violate to those that smoke it. Both of these arguments can be easily discounted by the legion(predicate) studies that take a crap been done on the egresss of cannabis twain medicinal and recreational.In the following paragraphs we lead explore the hard facts of marihuana that will discount the validity of the previously mentioned arguments as well as some common fallacies. I will focus first on the medical illusion. There currently exists a great debate concerning skunk hemp as a medicine. some well-intentioned leaders and members of the usual have been led misled b y the well-financed and organized pro-drug legalization lobby into accept there is merit to their argument that green goddess marijuana is a skilful and effective medicine.A review of the scientific research, expert medical testimony, and establishment agency findings demonstrates this to be erroneous. There is no justification for using marijuana as a medicine. The movement to legitimize smoking marijuana as a medicine is not encouraged by the Federal nutrient and Drug Administration, wellness and medical associations, or medical experts but kind of by groups such as the National Organization for the Reform of cannabis Laws (NORML) and the Drug Policy Foundation (DPF). These organizations have little medical expertise and party favor various forms of legalizing illicit drugs.The studies cited by the marijuana advocates have been establish to be unscientific, poorly researched, and involved pharmaceutical THC, not marijuana. An advocate that claimed he was an expert, test ified at the 1987 federal hearings to reschedule marijuana, was in fact a wellness counselor at a health spa who admitted under blaspheming to using ever soy illegal mind-altering drug he ever studied. Another expert admitted he had not kept up with modern medical or scientific information on marijuana for all over 18 geezerhood.Another doctor claimed there was voluminous medical research on the effectiveness of marijuana but under oath, when asked to cite the good turn of the studies, he replied, I would doubt very few. The fact is that there is not one reliable scientific study that shows smoking marijuana to be a safe and effective drug. The majority of the marijuana advocates evidence comes from unscientific, non-scrutinized or analyzed anecdotal statements from people with a variety of illnesses. It is un cognise whether these individuals apply marijuana prior to their illness or are using marijuana in combination with other medicines.It is also unk at presentn whether they have had recent medical examinations, are justifying their use of marijuana, experiencing a placebo effect, or experiencing the in unhealthfulating effect of smoking marijuana. The main psychoactive ingredient in marijuana (THC) is already legally available in pharmaceutical capsule form by prescription from medical doctors. This drug, Marinol, is less a great deal prescribed because of the potential perverse effects, and there are more effective new medicines currently available.Marinol differs from the rasping plant marijuana because it consists of one pure, well-studied, FDA-approved pharmaceutical in stable known dosages. Marijuana is an unstable mixture of over 400 chemicals including many toxic psychoactive chemicals, which are largely unstudied and appear in wild strengths. The manufacturers of Marinol, Roxane Laboratories Incorporated, do not agree with the pro-marijuana advocates that THC is safe and harmless. In the medical students Desk Reference, a good portio n of the description of Marinol includes warnings approximately the indecorous effects.Seriously, doesn t common sense dictate that it is not good medical practice to allow a substance to be used as a medicine if that product is ingested by smoking, not FDA-approved, do up of hundreds of different chemicals, and self-prescribed and administered by the patient. The federal government, over the last 20 years involving a progeny of administrations from both political parties, has determined that smoking marijuana has no redeeming medicinal value, and is in fact harmful to health. These political agencies include the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Food and Drug Administration, and the U. S. Public Health Service.Their modish finding, as recently as 1994, was affirmed in a decisiveness by the U. S. Court of Appeals in Washington, DC Since the pro-marijuana lobby has been unsuccessful in dealing with the federal government, they have targeted state and local governments to leg itimize smoking marijuana as a medicine. A careful examination of their legislative and/or ballot proposals reveals they are written to effectively neutralize the enforcement of most marijuana laws. Crude, intoxicating marijuana under their proposals would be easier to obtain and use than even the most harmless, low-level prescription drug.Major medical and health organizations, as well as the vast majority of nationally recognise expert medical doctors, scientists and researchers, have not accepted smoking marijuana as a safe and effective medicine. These organizations include the American checkup Association, the American Cancer Society, National Sclerosis Association, the American Glaucoma Association, American honorary society of Ophthalmology, National Eye Institute, National Cancer Institute, National Institute for neurologic Disorders and Stroke, National Institute of Dental Research, and the National Institute on allergy and Infectious Diseases.There are thousands of stu dies available documenting the harmful physical and mental effects of smoking marijuana. The harmful consequences include but are not limited to premature cancer, addiction, coordination and perception impairment, a number of mental disorders including depression, hatred and increased aggressiveness, general apathy, memory loss, reproductive disabilities, impairment to the immune system, numerous airway injuries, and other general problems associated with intoxication.So far I have shown why marijuana should be disregarded as medicinal now I intend to discount some more common fallacies that marijuana advocates like to throw around as well as the argument that marijuana causes no harm to the smoker. First, advocates for marijuana like to say laws against alcoholic beverage and drugs don t work so why have them. They often use prohibition in the early 1900 s as an example. compensate though prohibition was unpopular and all in effect for about fourteen years, it did impact the us e of alcohol.Alcohol use, alcohol- link up deaths, and admissions to hospitals for other alcohol related illnesses were all recoild approximately 50 percent. Also, contrary to what you hear, theres no evidence of a big increase in crime. That in all likelihood chafes for good gangster movies, but little else. Prohibition was rescinded because alcohol historically had been part of our lives, and the majority didn t support prohibition. Drugs, on the other hand, have not been part of our everyday lives, and over 80 percent of Americans favor drug prohibitionA second fallacy is that legalizing marijuana would reduce the number of crimes and would free up prison space for more ferocious offenders. First of all there are 12 million arrests made annually out of which 1 million are for drug violations, of these only 12 percent are sentenced to prison. Most of the criminals that are locked up already have rap sheets a mile long for different crimes anyways. today if we legalize marijua na the arrests would stop because of the change in the criminal regulation but the criminals wouldn t change their behavior and become law-abiding citizens.They will continue to commit crimes to pay rent, corrupt cars, go to concerts, buy clothes, eat, and buy legal drugs. Thirdly, most advocates like to use the Netherlands as an example of marijuana being legalized and not having any problems. The Netherlands has begun experiencing a variety of problems including a acquire in crime, welfare, unemployment, and addicts from other countries migrating there to indulge their drug appetites. A one-fourth common fallacy is that if we legalize marijuana we would save at least 20 cardinal dollars annually that is now used towards law enforcement.What this fallacy assumes is that there would be no governmental comprises associated with distribution, regulation, and control of legal drugs. Using alcohol as a model, we know these costs can be substantial. Knowing government, there is ver y little they do that is cost effective. In 1965, when we started Medicare, Congress projected that it would cost this country $12 billion by 1990. The actual costs that year were $110 billion. In 1968 fodder stamps cost $173 million annually, and now, less than 30 years later, the price chamfer is $24 billion. And, finally the greatest fallacy that marijuana does not harm the user.The fact remains that marijuana and hashish are intoxicating substances that make the user high. The degree of mental and physical impairment depends on the kernel and strength of marijuana smoked. There is a substantial difference in the midst of the 2 to 5 percent THC weed of the 70s and the 10 to 20 percent THC in todays weed. There is a definite reason why the higher grade is more in demand(predicate) and expensive, and thats simply because it gives the user a more powerful high. Studies show marijuana can and often does cause apathy, diminishes mental capacity, causes difficulty in concentrating , decline in performance, and lost motivation.Thousands of studies also show marijuana use adversely affects the brain, reproduction process, immune system, respiratory system, cardiovascular system, and remains in the body for extended periods of time. In addition, marijuana use often impairs form thought processes, distorts reality, reduces self-control, and releases inhibitions, all of which increase the chance of harmful and criminal behavior. Many times the user is unaware he or she is being unnatural unless told by others. A Stanford Medical School study showed pilots to be damage 24 hours after smoking one joint, even though they felt they were functioning normally.In conclusion, the bottom line is, whenever persons are under the influence, they become a threat to themselves and others. We dont need more stimulate people on our streets, at public events, or driving on our highways. Traffic fatality studies clearly demonstrate a disproportionate number of deaths caused by drivers under the influence of marijuana. Why would we want to make a substance like that legal, inexpensive and readily available to satisfy he desires of a few who already choose to violate our laws? Havent the advocates learned anything from our experience with drunkenness?